Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label gluconeogenesis

Carb Your Enthusiasm

If you open a medical textbook and look up "Essential Nutrients"—the specific compounds humans must eat to avoid death—you will find a list of Essential Amino Acids (Protein). You will find a list of Essential Fatty Acids (Fat). You will not find a single "Essential Carbohydrate." This controversially contradicts everything we are told about "balanced diets," but the biochemistry is indisputable. While your body uses glucose, it does not need to eat glucose. The Distinction: Requirement vs. Synthesis To survive, the human body has specific hardware requirements. Essential Amino Acids: There are 9 amino acids (like Leucine and Tryptophan) your body cannot make. If you don't eat them, your muscles waste away and you die. Essential Fatty Acids: There are fats (like Omega-3 and Omega-6) your body cannot create. If you don't eat them, your cells fail. Carbohydrates do not make this list. You could theoretically live the rest of your life without e...

And He Called It Macro-ni

In the world of diet culture, we are obsessed with "The Macros." We track them, we count them, and we worship them. The word Macro is short, in this case, for Macro nutrients (all you economics folks can sit back down). The prevailing wisdom—especially in the "If It Fits Your Macros" (IIFYM) crowd—is that the body is just a simple calculator. 50g of Fat is 50g of Fat. 20g of Protein is 20g of Protein. As long as the numbers balance at the end of the day, you win. This is a lie. To understand why, we have to look at the word itself. "Macro"  comes from the Greek μακρός (makrós), meaning “long” or "large." In nutrition, they are called Macronutrients simply because our bodies need them in large quantities (grams) compared to Micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), which we need in tiny amounts (milligrams or micrograms). But here is the trap: Just because we need a "large" amount of something doesn't mean the source doesn't matte...

A Complete Lack of Pies

There is no shortage of fear-mongering when it comes to the ketogenic diet. But the single most dangerous and persistent myth—the one critics use to dismiss the entire lifestyle—is the claim that ketosis is "just a fancy word for starvation." This argument intentionally confuses two metabolic states that are as different as night and day. It’s like looking at a roaring, controlled bonfire and calling it an out-of-control forest fire. Yes, both states produce ketones. But one is a precise, well-fed, and restorative metabolic process. The other is a desperate, destructive, and catabolic survival mechanism. As someone who is 22 hours into a fast every single day, I am not "starving." I am thriving. And the difference lies in the quality of the fuel and the abundance of essential nutrients. Part 1: The "Two Fat Tanks" (Storage vs. Essential) To understand this, we must first understand that not all fat on your body is the same. Your body maintains two very d...

Glucoser to the Heart

In my post, "The Tale of Two Engines" , I explained how my clean keto lifestyle is a deliberate choice to shut down my body's fast, inefficient "Glucose Engine" and fire up its powerful, long-range "Fat Engine" (Ketogenesis). This immediately, and rightly, brings up the most common question—and the most common criticism—of a ketogenic diet: "But Chris, I read that your brain needs glucose to survive. Aren't you starving your brain?" This is one of my favorite topics because the answer is so elegant, and it perfectly illustrates the brilliance of the human body. The premise of the question is 100% correct: Yes, parts of our body must have glucose to function. Your brain can get up to 75% of its fuel from ketones, but that other 25% requires glucose. Furthermore, your red blood cells (which have no mitochondria) and parts of your kidneys can only run on glucose. The myth is that you must eat glucose to have glucose. The fact is, your ...