In my role as a Manager of Program Quality and Compliance, I operate on a simple principle: Subjective experience is not evidence.
If an instructor tells me a program is "going well," that is an opinion. I cannot verify an opinion. I need retention rates, grade distributions, and student satisfaction surveys. I need the metrics.
Yet, when it comes to our own health, we frequently abandon this rigor. We rely on the most unreliable instrument in the building: The Mirror.
Defining the Distortion (The "Phantom Fat" Phenomenon)
Before looking at the numbers, it is important to define the cognitive error we are dealing with.
In clinical terms, Body Dysmorphia involves an obsessive focus on a perceived flaw in appearance.
It is a synchronization error between the eye and the brain. Your eyes perceive the new physical reality (the smaller body), but your brain relies on an internal "body map" that was built over years or decades. This internal map has not yet been updated. Consequently, when you look in the mirror, your brain rejects the new visual input as an anomaly and defaults to the stored, outdated image of yourself.
This is not just "low self-esteem"; it is a lag in cognitive processing.
The Data vs. The Reflection
This morning, I conducted a review of my own metrics dating back to October. The data is unequivocal:
Starting Weight (October): 350.4 lbs. (a year previous, I was 380 lbs.)
Current Weight (January): 325.0 lbs.
Total Variance: -25.4 lbs.
Metabolic Status: A1c of 4.5% (High Insulin Sensitivity)
By any objective standard, this is a successful "program implementation." The intervention (Clean Keto + 22:2 Fasting + Daily Calisthenics + Cardio) is working.
However, when I look in the mirror, I often do not see a man who has lost 25 pounds. I see the same man I saw in October. My brain effectively "hallucinates" the old version of myself, overlaying the past image onto the present reality.
The "Latency" of Self-Perception
Psychologically, this is a common phenomenon, often exacerbated by my ADHD brain. We struggle with object permanence - the ability to hold a concept in our minds when it is not immediately in front of us. Conversely, we also struggle with updating those concepts.
The internal image I have of myself was built over years. It is a "cached" file. Losing 25.4 pounds in a few months is a rapid change, and the "software" of my self-perception has not yet downloaded the update. There is a lag time.
If I relied on my feelings—on what I "see" in the mirror—I might feel discouraged. I might think, "Nothing is changing, so why bother?" This is where relying on feelings becomes dangerous. It leads to abandoning a successful protocol because the visual feedback isn't fast enough.
The Quality Audit
This is why I track everything. I track the macros, the fasting hours, the blood work, and the scale weight.
When the mirror lies to me, I open the spreadsheet. The spreadsheet tells me that 25.4 pounds of mass have ceased to exist. The spreadsheet tells me that my blood chemistry has fundamentally shifted. The spreadsheet tells me that the pants I am wearing are two sizes smaller than the ones I wore in October.
These are facts. The image in the mirror is an interpretation.
The Takeaway
For anyone on a similar journey of reinvention, my advice is to stop trusting your eyes and start trusting your data. The mirror reflects your insecurities, your history, and your mood. The data reflects only the truth.
If you are doing the work, and the numbers are moving, you are winning. Do not let a glitch in your perception convince you to shut down the system.
Comments
Post a Comment